What are ghosts made of, and why do ghost hunters notice EMF surges at active, haunted places?
That’s the topic of a June 2018 article at Higgypop, What Are Ghosts Made Of?
It’s an unusually good article, though I heartily disagree with some claims in it. (I’ve written a general review at my author blog, FionaBroome.com.)
But, certain parts of the Higgypop article are worth repeating for ghost hunters.
The first is how the Higgypop writer distinguishes intelligent (active, sentient) hauntings from residual energy hauntings:
There’s a belief within the paranormal world that some ghosts are intelligent and capable of interacting with their surroundings, and then there’s residual hauntings which are said to be merely events from the past being replayed.
Residual hauntings are thought to be an imprint of energy that has been left behind by someone who suffered a tragic, traumatic, premature death, usually a murder, suicide or execution.
I agree with most of that, but I don’t believe all residual energy hauntings connect directly with someone’s death. (Update: See Higgypop’s clarification in the comments below.)
In the past, I’ve recommended singing “Happy birthday to you” in dining rooms and kitchens, to see whether anything happens. You could try “For He’s a Jolly Good Fellow” in front hallways, dining rooms, and immediately outside the front entry to an estate, too.
Neither of those have anything to do with death or even trauma. Both songs have triggered ghostly results at a surprising number of haunted sites.
The Higgypop article also shares an interesting insight related to residual energy hauntings:
The phenomenon is known as “stone tape theory” due to the belief that energy is captured and stored like a video recording in the surrounding bricks, woodwork, stone and possibly even the soil. When the conditions are right, these materials release this energy and you sense or see the event occur in exactly the same position as it did years ago.
But then, I disagree with the next part of that article:
As residual hauntings represent nothing more than a reflection of the past, you can’t communicate with them. The visions seen are not aware of their surroundings. They cannot interact with you and are not aware of your presence.
For me, “communication” means anything my team or I do, which results in a cause-and-effect reaction at the haunted site.
While residual energy hauntings don’t seem to interact with us as a sentient, “intelligent” ghost would, I believe that changes in the surroundings – an anniversary, a time of day, etc., as well as triggers used by researchers – can create a cause-and-effect result.
Yes, maybe I’m delving too deeply into semantics.
Mostly, I don’t want new researchers to write off residual energy hauntings as something that are entirely hit-or-miss. Some of them are far more predictable than that. Triggers can work with residual energy hauntings.
Most of the next part of the article is good:
When it comes to intelligent hauntings it’s a little different. These types of hauntings are the classic “ghost”, they can reportedly move objects, push or touch people, slam doors and even throw objects across a room. So clearly when they manifest there is some kind of physical force behind them.
However, since some people seem to be able to move matter with their minds (psychokinesis), I balk at the idea that ghosts “clearly” have a physical force behind them.
Despite my ambivalence about some claims in this article, I agree with the conclusion:
Perhaps the truth is, it doesn’t really matter. While some ghost sightings can be written off as hoaxes, the majority of ghost sightings come from people who genuinely believe they have seen something supernatural. So whether ghosts are electromagnetic energy, a reflection of the past, or a trick of the mind, you can’t take the experience away from someone who has witnessed a ghost.
You can read the full higgypop article at:
Also, I’m interested in your thoughts about these topics, especially as they relate to ghost hunting.