Comments on: Gilson Road Cemetery – streak of energy?

By: nate montbleau

nate montbleau — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:58:55 +0000

Hello,

Hi fiona my name is nate I’m from massachusetts I’ve been watching your website for
A while now I like it a lot I’ve bee researching paranormal for about a year now and I would
Like to touch base with you on some evidence are you still ghost hunting would love to chat!!

By: Hillary L'Heureux

Hillary L'Heureux — Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:28:13 +0000

was the thing in the image in other pictures? because i have personally gotten some stuff like that in pictures at gilson..on a digital camera

By: Fiona Broome

Fiona Broome — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:22:59 +0000

If it makes you more comfortable to seek explanations for interesting and chilling anomalies, by all means keep looking. You’ll certainly find them!

The fact is, there is no clear, irrefutable evidence to prove ghosts or haunted places. If there was, there would be no debate.

Merriam-Webster defines audacity as “intrepid boldness.” (Intrepid means fearless.) With that in mind, yes, most professional ghost hunters have ample audacity. We wouldn’t be in this field if we didn’t.

By: Dadeus

Dadeus — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:26:34 +0000

Let me step up on my self righteous soap box for a moment.

You have the audacity to call this a “Credible Anomaly”? Let’s start with the film- a store brand film, which becomes a store brand film because it is cheaper to make than name brand film. Why? Because is isn’t made to the same standards as name brand film. Since Shaw’s isn’t in the film business, this film could also have been sitting around unrefridgerated for quite a while. The second problem is that it was developed at Target at their one hour service, which means it was developed on site by someone who may only be marginally trained with chemicals which may be near depletion. Unfortunately, this type of evidence is not credible at all and extremely suspect.