<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ghosts &#8211; New Hampshire Seacoast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hollowhill.com/ghosts-new-hampshire-seacoast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hollowhill.com/ghosts-new-hampshire-seacoast/</link>
	<description>real ghosts and ghost hunting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:05:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fiona Broome</title>
		<link>http://hollowhill.com/ghosts-new-hampshire-seacoast/comment-page-1/#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Broome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollowhill.com/ghosthunting/ghosts-new-hampshire-seacoast/#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>Sophia,

I&#039;m not sure what you&#039;re looking for.  If you&#039;re looking for figures draped in sheets... sorry, that&#039;s Casper the Friendly Ghost.

If you want a photo that&lt;em&gt; looks&lt;/em&gt; like an apparition, they&#039;re generally double exposures or PhotoShop products.  Only a couple of apparition-type photos are still unexplained.

Online, almost &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; can be produced with PhotoShop.  As I&#039;ve said in several articles, &quot;ghost photos&quot; are only as good as the integrity and expertise of the photographer. 

We can&#039;t &lt;em&gt;prove&lt;/em&gt; anything about photos that seem to represent ghosts.  All we can document is what&lt;em&gt; isn&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; anything paranormal; what remains -- the unexplained -- may (or may not) represent a ghost.

So, if you don&#039;t believe the photos at this website, that&#039;s fine.  You don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; to believe me or anyone else.  

The photos at this website (and in my books) are the best that I can offer.

Sincerely,
Fiona</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sophia,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re looking for.  If you&#8217;re looking for figures draped in sheets&#8230; sorry, that&#8217;s Casper the Friendly Ghost.</p>
<p>If you want a photo that<em> looks</em> like an apparition, they&#8217;re generally double exposures or PhotoShop products.  Only a couple of apparition-type photos are still unexplained.</p>
<p>Online, almost <em>anything</em> can be produced with PhotoShop.  As I&#8217;ve said in several articles, &#8220;ghost photos&#8221; are only as good as the integrity and expertise of the photographer. </p>
<p>We can&#8217;t <em>prove</em> anything about photos that seem to represent ghosts.  All we can document is what<em> isn&#8217;t</em> anything paranormal; what remains &#8212; the unexplained &#8212; may (or may not) represent a ghost.</p>
<p>So, if you don&#8217;t believe the photos at this website, that&#8217;s fine.  You don&#8217;t <em>have</em> to believe me or anyone else.  </p>
<p>The photos at this website (and in my books) are the best that I can offer.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Fiona</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sophia</title>
		<link>http://hollowhill.com/ghosts-new-hampshire-seacoast/comment-page-1/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>sophia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hollowhill.com/ghosthunting/ghosts-new-hampshire-seacoast/#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>can you show me any pics at all of a real ghost</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you show me any pics at all of a real ghost</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
