“Ghost boy” appeared in a widely-publicized photo in late February 2010.
The story was: A British builder took the photo at a school in England that was being demolished. When he reviewed the pictures he took of the demolition process, he saw the image of a little boy in one photo. The builder claimed that the hairs on the back of his neck went up.
The school was Anlaby Primary School, near Hull, East Yorkshire, in the U.K. Part of the original 1936 building was being demolished. (The rest of the school is still in use.) The site has long had a reputation for being haunted.
At least two major UK newspapers considered the picture newsworthy, The Sun and the Daily Mail. (Click on the Daily Mail screenshot, below, to see the full-sized image and article.)
However, this photo was a fake… one of many hoaxes we’re seeing online.
This particular photo was created with a 99-cent iPod/iPhone app called Ghost Capture. The image of the little boy is at the center of the app screenshot below, in the second photo row from the bottom.
This kind of nonsense is among the reasons why I don’t analyze or critique “ghost photos” for readers.
People send me photos all the time; reporters and journalists are especially eager to get me to say that a “ghost picture” is real, when they know it isn’t. (I’m pretty sure they want us to look gullible or stupid.)
While we want to assure readers when their genuine photo shows an image that they find comforting, we can’t confirm that ghostly images in pictures are really ghosts.
Any photo can be made to look like it has an anomaly. From 99-cent iPhone apps to Adobe Photoshop, these pictures can look utterly fake or convincing. Anyone can be fooled.
I’ve said it before: A ghost photo is only as reliable as the expertise and integrity of the person who took it.
If you want to learn how to evaluate ghost photographs, browse my articles on the topic. I don’t know anyone else who’s spent nearly as many years as I have, trying to make sense of “ghost” photos.
Generally, ghost photos don’t show crisp images of people. At best, the ghostly images are blurry, indistinct, and sometimes difficult to identify unless you know exactly what you’re looking for. (The same can be said for many EVP recordings.)
Though I’m delighted when I see an eerie image in my own ghost photos, many strange photos can be explained as tricks of the light or something natural, rather than an actual haunting.
It’s smart to rule out the normal explanations, before placing ghost photos online.